Self-Disclosure

Every session asks a therapist to make a small judgment call: say something personal, or hold back. Withhold too much and the relationship feels one-sided and remote; share too much and the hour drifts toward the therapist’s material instead of the client’s.

The five books below move from broad research to narrower, more specific territory. Topics include practical, population-specific guidance, real case examples, and finally the question of why therapists disclose at all.

This page contains Amazon affiliate links — if you buy a book through one, I earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.

Self-Disclosure in Psychotherapy

Barry A. Farber, The Guilford Press, 2006

This is the only book on this page that gives equal research weight to both sides of the exchange. Farber treats self-disclosure as something both people in the room do, not just the therapist. He works through patient disclosure first: what clients reveal, why they sometimes hold back even in a confidential setting, and what the research says about whether disclosure actually helps treatment. This includes a chapter on how culture influences the willingness to disclose.

He turns next to therapists, tracing the field’s shift away from the traditional idea that a good therapist reveals nothing personal, and the judgment calls that guide practice now. A final chapter applys the same question to supervision, where the same dilemma plays out under a different power dynamic.

Recommended as the first stop on this page for clinicians early or mid-career who want the general research landscape. The standalone chapter on supervisee and supervisor disclosure also makes it a natural fit for clinical supervisors and training directors, and its research-and-theory synthesis suits graduate students and trainees better than a single clinician’s personal take would.

Therapist Self-Disclosure: An Evidence-Based Guide for Practitioners

Graham S. Danzer, Routledge, 2018

This is the only book here organized around client population rather than theory or research area. It opens with ethics applied directly to practice, then moves through theory and a review of what outcome research supports. From there it narrows to timing: how to judge the moment a disclosure will land as connection rather than distraction.

The second half breaks into separate chapters by population. These include LGBTQ clients, Christian clients, multicultural clients, clients with eating disorders or trauma histories, forensic settings, clients at risk for suicide, clients with intellectual disabilities, and clients in substance-use recovery.

This is the practical counterpart to Farber’s book above. Farber covers whether disclosure helps; Danzer covers what to do with the client in front of you.

Buy on Amazon →

The Therapeutic Use of Self: Counselling Practice, Research and Supervision

Val Wosket, Routledge, 2016 (originally published 1999)

The other books on this page focus solely on disclosure. Wosket treats it as one piece of something larger: what a therapist’s own presence, personality, and willingness to break convention contribute to outcomes. The book starts with the counsellor’s own edge of awareness, then moves through a research study Wosket ran into the use of self. From there it turns to harder territory – the impaired therapist, the value of therapist failure, and when breaking the field’s own rules is clinically justified. A chapter on “the shadow side of the use of self” addresses how those same qualities – presence, personality, willingness to break convention – can also enable boundary violations.

This book won’t help you decide what to say in one particular moment. But it’s the one to read when the question is less “should I say this” and more “what am I bringing into every room regardless.”

Buy on Amazon →

Psychotherapist Revealed: Therapists Speak About Self-Disclosure in Psychotherapy

Edited by Andrea Bloomgarden and Rosemary B. Mennuti, Routledge, 2009

This is the only book on the page built from case narrative rather than research or theory. Contributors across psychology, social work, art therapy, counseling, and dance/movement therapy each describe an actual disclosure decision they made and what happened afterward. Part I covers the competing foundations, from Maroda’s case for minimal disclosure to Zur’s work on standard of care and ethics. Part II turns to case examples by orientation and clientele, including a chapter on borderline personality disorder.

The book treats therapist disclosure as largely settled rather than a live debate. This is a real limitation if you’re looking for the case against it.

Reach for this one when the other books here have given you the theory and you want to see an actual decision play out.

Buy on Amazon →

Celebrating the Wounded Healer: Psychotherapist Pain, Post-Traumatic Growth and Self-Disclosure

Edited by Sharon Klayman Farber, Routledge, 2017

Not to be confused with Barry A. Farber’s book above; different author, no relation.

Farber and her contributors work from a simple premise: many psychotherapists are drawn to the profession by their own early traumatic experiences and their own psychoanalytic treatment. The book doesn’t idealize suffering or dismiss its risks, including the risk that a therapist’s own wounds feed narcissism rather than compassion.

Contributors range beyond psychoanalysis into shamanic and religious healing traditions as well. They all ask the same question: does a therapist’s wound help them see more clearly, or does it cloud the work? Chapters trace the concept itself back through Freud’s own history, distinguish a “wounding healer” who repeats their own damage on patients from one whose woundedness becomes genuinely useful.

Read alongside Wosket above. One explains why the impulse to disclose exists; the other shows what happens when it goes wrong.

Buy on Amazon →